[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#916207: lintian: debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature certainty considered annoying



Hi Scott,

Many people find the tag cumbersome, and some people think it should
go away. At the same time, upstream sources are more trustworthy when
verified; and that is in the project's overall interest. Could your
concern be resolved by better naming?

I process the tag name (it has already been renamed once [1]) as
"debian-watch-does-not-check-A-gpg-signature." Without a signature
that is an objective fact.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 5:18 AM Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
> As designed, debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature does not check if
> upstream provides a GPG signature to make checking it possible.

When I process the name as
"debian-watch-does-not-check-THE-gpg-signature"---which is maybe the
way you are reading it---it means the same as
'debian-watch-could-verify-download' but the tag does not behave like
it.

My suggestion would be to rename the tag to
'built-from-unverified-sources' or similar. What do you think?

> when if there's no upstream signature, it's not at all a problem
> the maintainer can fix.  "Certainty: possible" seems much more reasonable to
> me.

The tag would continue to be of Certainty: certain.

Kind regards,
Felix

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/0cbebd4ba0b2a067383616e18981eeb9de5d7df2


Reply to: