Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
From: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 13:03:40 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 154436062097.3726.15299056329618976998.reportbug@neophite>
Reply-to: Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@debian.org>, 916023@bugs.debian.org

Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.116
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

please add check, that binary package could have "Architecture: all"
instead of "any". See #915976 for example.

I believe checking that none of files in package have ELF magic is quite
reliable.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Processed: Bug #916023 in lintian marked as pending
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
- Bug#916023: marked as done (lintian: package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files should use file type)
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#916021: lintian: Please check for references to build directory
Next by Date: [Git][lintian/lintian][stretch-backports] 43 commits: Open new changelog entry for 2.5.116.
Previous by thread: Bug#916021: lintian: Please check for references to build directory
Next by thread: Bug#916023: lintian: Please check if architecture could be "all" instead of "any"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread