[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#913723: please confirm that dictionaries should move to section localization



On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 05:44:42 -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > Oh dear, we appear to have generated a lot of philosophical
> > > conversation here for what was almost-certainly just a slight typo
> > > or misstep on the behalf of the aforementioned bug submitter.
> > 
> > See my other reply. This was certainly neither a typo nor a misstep,
> > it was fully intentional.
> 
> For some reason I didn't see this. Reverted in:
> 
>    https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/dcfeeb7c460be82c9ad1b3d99bf44e06746e649c

Thanks!

> > :(, but if you are going to change that at least make it consistent
> > with all other dictionaries and probably the sounds too. IMO having
> > this overall inconsistent section placement is worse than having the
> > specific hunspell packages in the wrong section.
> 
> Could you propose a patch that would fix this to your satisfaction?
> I'm having a little difficulty sorting this out in my head now
> after applying, reverting, etc. etc. :)

If you ask me personally, I think lintian is fine as it is! I'd
probably just update the section descriptions to clarify this, and
prepare a mass override request for ftp-masters. But I'd like to hear
from the reporters and others who complained about the secion change
to know whether they have been convinced by the arguments? :)

At the same time, being this now the nth time I've gone over all
section names/descriptions, I'm strongly considering trying to push
forward a way to make dak expose them or package them so that we only
need to modify in one or two places instead of many.

Thanks,
Guillem


Reply to: