Bug#906155: marked as done (lintian: should raise an error if a changes file's Version includes ~bpo but Distribution isn't *-backports)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2018 09:19:43 +0000
with message-id <E1fqxOZ-000Fbk-TV@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#906155: fixed in lintian 2.5.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #906155,
regarding lintian: should raise an error if a changes file's Version includes ~bpo but Distribution isn't *-backports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
906155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.50.4
Severity: wishlist
>From time to time uploads intended at stable-backports end up in
stable-proposed-updates due to incorrect Distribution in .changes.
lintian should be able to flag that as an error. Something like the
below, maybe (+ tests)?
Cheers,
Julien
diff --git a/checks/changes-file.desc b/checks/changes-file.desc
index 1a668853d..2c2ab17a4 100644
--- a/checks/changes-file.desc
+++ b/checks/changes-file.desc
@@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ Info: The version number doesn't comply with the standard backport version
the target distribution.
Ref: http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
+Tag: upload-has-backports-version-number
+Severity: serious
+Certainty: certain
+Info: The version number looks like a backport, but the upload's target
+ distribution is not a backport suite.
+
Tag: distribution-and-changes-mismatch
Severity: normal
Certainty: possible
diff --git a/checks/changes-file.pm b/checks/changes-file.pm
index 478bbe33d..46746b5c0 100644
--- a/checks/changes-file.pm
+++ b/checks/changes-file.pm
@@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ sub run {
tag 'backports-changes-missing';
}
}
+ } else {
+ if ($info->field('version') =~ m/~bpo(\d+)\+(\d+)$/) {
+ tag
+ 'upload-has-backports-version-number',
+ $info->field('version'),
+ $distribution;
+ }
}
}
if (!$KNOWN_DISTS->known($dist)) {
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.97
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 906155@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (supplier of updated lintian package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 08:47:03 +0000
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.97
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
lintian - Debian package checker
Closes: 886036 905843 905881 906155
Changes:
lintian (2.5.97) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Summary of tag changes:
+ Added:
- debian-changelog-version-requires-debian-revision
- maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-xfonts-utils
- malformed-debian-changelog-version
- missing-call-to-update-fonts
- upload-has-backports-version-number
+ Renamed:
- native-package-with-dash-version ->
hyphen-in-native-debian-changelog-version
- non-native-package-with-native-version ->
hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version
.
* checks/changes-file.{desc,pm}:
+ [CL] Apply patch from Julien Cristau (with test) to warn about
uploads that have a version containing "~bpo" but their target
distribution is not *-backports. (Closes: #906155)
* checks/scripts.{desc,pm}:
+ [CL] Check for packages that contain X11 fonts but do not run
update-fonts-* in their postinst or depend on xfonts-utils.
(Closes: #905881)
* checks/source-changelog.{desc.pm}:
+ [FL] Rework, centralise and improve version parsing.
(Closes: #886036)
.
* data/common/dh_addons:
+ [NT] Refresh data.
* data/debhelper/dh_{commands,packages}:
+ [NT] Refresh data.
* data/spelling/corrections:
+ [PW] Add a number of corrections.
* data/testsuite/known-restrictions:
+ [CL] Re-add "allow-stderr" accidentally dropped in 0cb688fb.
(Closes: #905843)
.
* private/refresh-debhelper-data:
+ [NT] Add debhelper-compat an alternative to debhelper in
the data files.
.
* t/scripts/01-critic/runner.pl:
+ [CL] Bump perltidy test dependencies to prevent a failing build in
backports, etc.
Checksums-Sha1:
201a7700b55171b6409dcb51542127e76ed5989d 3511 lintian_2.5.97.dsc
afca332adc396393daadfce5c4ca01aba59847dd 1581324 lintian_2.5.97.tar.xz
0ab775770eb022e1455dd2c4f38b949e31b875ca 1131112 lintian_2.5.97_all.deb
7ec67033ae22df38abafa4a50ffc492535f55169 16206 lintian_2.5.97_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
37f859952c2eb81ec43da848accb6ab471333c1f1e9f22f410c7f7d5a776a874 3511 lintian_2.5.97.dsc
b6292b9d6f1fe903372a9da282675b710c20aacddb4787988c34a38a113fca5b 1581324 lintian_2.5.97.tar.xz
32abbd5c62d8d2a6b05b720d58c8345b7f5875376605f2edf44b5f9c24833908 1131112 lintian_2.5.97_all.deb
efd69464d2c9cf412fd8242af269e36b088376732789c843d1d8a403833d9231 16206 lintian_2.5.97_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
d1abaff79bbfe8d823c426807cb2566e 3511 devel optional lintian_2.5.97.dsc
cc0dd27d1426112f4ae549beffb53f9b 1581324 devel optional lintian_2.5.97.tar.xz
9cb5e6354daf0721dfc92a34d1c5a6f1 1131112 devel optional lintian_2.5.97_all.deb
896b4ea6e98543cf42c4b3432ab83055 16206 devel optional lintian_2.5.97_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=goH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: