[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#901507: lintian: warn if debhelper is in B-D-Arch or B-D-Indep but not Build-Depends



tags 901507 - patch pending
tags 901631 - patch pending
thanks

Chris Lamb wrote:

> Fixed in Git, pending upload:
> 
>   https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/9bed2a0905296fae83c23561a70c838198c05fc3

Hm, Simon, are we not already covered by "clean-should-be-satisfied-by-build-depends"
here?

I'm also seeing a bunch of false-positives in the addon checker -
using the dh Python addon shouldn't mean that python can't be in
Build-Depends-Indep. Or dpatch! For example:

@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
 W: scripts source: binary-arch-rules-but-pkg-is-arch-indep
 W: scripts source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends-indep: dpatch
 W: scripts source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
+W: scripts source: debhelper-addon-needs-to-be-in-build-depends Build-Depends-Indep: dpatch
+W: scripts source: debhelper-addon-needs-to-be-in-build-depends Build-Depends-Indep: python
 W: scripts source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends scripts
 W: scripts source: debhelper-compat-file-is-missing
 W: scripts source: debian-watch-file-declares-multiple-versions line 7
fail tests::legacy-scripts: output differs!

Thoughts?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-


Reply to: