Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive

To: Marc Dequènes <duck@duckcorp.org>, 818609@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 11:46:43 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1523011603.1556469.1328684944.3D485BD8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 818609@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b6aafa79e9d554ccdff77a008faa36ee@duckcorp.org>
References: <145831671127.31359.16315041336215318296.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp> <[🔎] b6aafa79e9d554ccdff77a008faa36ee@duckcorp.org> <145831671127.31359.16315041336215318296.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp>

Hi Marc,

> $ lintian weboob_1.3-1_all.deb
> E: weboob: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/share/weboob/imm-o-matic

I believe you are missing a dependency on Python 3 for this script. I
would concede this is a little misleading so have updated the output
to include the offending shebang:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=8385bfa725a324d8591343179e0207d72aec9511

I trust this resolves your issue. :)


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
  - From: Marc Dequènes (duck) <duck@duckcorp.org>

Prev by Date: [lintian] 01/01: Also include the offending/unknown shebang in the output of missing (unversioned) interpreters.
Next by Date: Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
Previous by thread: Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
Next by thread: Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread