Bug#913466: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB

To: 913466@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>
Subject: Bug#913466: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 17:42:57 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 1541976177.1316321.1573323560.69E4E732@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 913466@bugs.debian.org
References: <[🔎] 154193964854.463.6126115609229139252.reportbug@nyera.fatal.se>

tags 913466 + pending
thanks

Dear Andreas,

Thank you so much for you in-depth bug report. I've implemented this
in Git, pending upload:

  https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/97a66c772cde3843579a1d50da267e920e9d02f9

  checks/init.d.desc | 9 +++++----
  checks/init.d.pm   | 7 ++-----
  debian/changelog   | 6 ++++++
  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>

References:
- Bug#913466: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
  - From: Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/share/lintian/collection/java-info line 115.
Next by Date: Processed: Re: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
Previous by thread: Bug#913466: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
Next by thread: Processed: Re: lintian: init.d-script-does-not-implement-optional-option status is actually required by LSB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread