[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#906211: marked as done (lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep despite Recommends)

Your message dated Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:03:23 -0400
with message-id <1540580603.2870180.1556003928.52B9AC43@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#906211: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep despite Recommends
has caused the Debian Bug report #906211,
regarding lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep despite Recommends
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
906211: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906211
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.96
Severity: normal

Source package stanza:

Package: simkolab-common
[…]
Recommends: python | python3
[…]

Binary package also contains the Recommends line (checked).

E: simkolab-common: python-script-but-no-python-dep usr/share/simkolab/php_unserialize.py #!/usr/bin/python



-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unreleased
  APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: x32 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, amd64

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.31.1-4
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-9
ii  diffstat                       1.61-1
ii  dpkg                           1.19.0.5+b1
ii  file                           1:5.34-2
ii  gettext                        0.19.8.1-7
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.4
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.34
ii  libarchive-zip-perl            1.60-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.51-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.39-1
ii  libdigest-sha-perl             6.02-1
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.19.0.5
ii  libemail-valid-perl            1.202-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl           0.08-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                20180523.0-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl         0.416-1+b3
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-12
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl       0.13-1
ii  libtimedate-perl               2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl                    1.74-1
ii  libxml-simple-perl             2.25-1
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl           0.72+repack-1
ii  man-db                         2.8.4-2
ii  patchutils                     0.3.4-2
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.26.2-7
ii  t1utils                        1.41-2
ii  xz-utils                       5.2.2-1.3

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
pn  libperlio-gzip-perl  <none>

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch     2.31.1-4
ii  dpkg-dev               1.19.0.5
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.72-3+b2
pn  libtext-template-perl  <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Thorsten,

> As you pointed out, there’s currently no way to model
> the right thing, given the implicit choice in the
> shebang line.

I'll go ahead and close the bug in that case. Thanks for getting
back to me so soon.


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

--- End Message ---
Reply to: