Bug#906281: lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"

To: 906281@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>, Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, Debian Emacsen team <debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org>, bremner@debian.org, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
Subject: Bug#906281: lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"
From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:47:05 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1540579625.2865103.1555989864.37241601@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 906281@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1536493762.108588.1501823736.0C2DD786@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1536493762.108588.1501823736.0C2DD786@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87lg9lljd9.fsf@c-cactus.ontheroad.deuxchevaux.org>

Chris Lamb wrote:

> tags 906281 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa
> > are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"
> 
> So, what are the next, concrete, steps for Lintian here? I don't
> currently see a consensus...?

Gentle ping on this folks?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#906211: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep despite Recommends
Next by Date: Bug#890468: lintian: source-is-missing false positive when d/missing-sources/foo is a symlink
Previous by thread: Bug#906211: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep despite Recommends
Next by thread: Bug#906281: lintian: Severity and Certainty of emacsen-common-without-dh-elpa are wrong / false positives despite "Certainty: certain"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread