[lintian] 01/01: Drop the rouge → rogue correction; it's an (admittedly) old-fashioned word for red cheek makeup as well as being a fairly-common French word. It was causing a false-positive in the spelling-error-in-binary tag for osmocom-analog. Thorsten Alteholz for the report. (Closes: #891794)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit 69971d6a860282ba6f49dcaf93a0adbaa2673730
Author: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Thu Mar 1 09:18:30 2018 +0000
Drop the rouge → rogue correction; it's an (admittedly) old-fashioned word for red cheek makeup as well as being a fairly-common French word. It was causing a false-positive in the spelling-error-in-binary tag for osmocom-analog. Thorsten Alteholz for the report. (Closes: #891794)
---
data/spelling/corrections | 1 -
debian/changelog | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/data/spelling/corrections b/data/spelling/corrections
index 496dbc3..45ef25b 100644
--- a/data/spelling/corrections
+++ b/data/spelling/corrections
@@ -3361,7 +3361,6 @@ rmeoved||removed
rmeove||remove
rmeoves||removes
rouding||rounding
-rouge||rogue
rougly||roughly
rouine||routine
rouines||routines
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 2a139d0..ebc5b16 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ lintian (2.5.78) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
browser-based interface. Thanks to Paul Wise for the report.
(Closes: #891688)
+ * data/spelling/corrections:
+ + [CL] Drop the rouge → rogue correction; it's an (admittedly)
+ old-fashioned word for red cheek makeup as well as being a
+ fairly-common French word. It was causing a false-positive in the
+ spelling-error-in-binary tag for osmocom-analog. Thorsten Alteholz
+ for the report. (Closes: #891794)
+
-- Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:04:15 +0000
lintian (2.5.77) unstable; urgency=medium
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git
Reply to: