Processed: Re: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:15:14 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.151922606319673.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 1519226061.168370.1278456232.53564322@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 890959 + pending
Bug #890959 [lintian] lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
890959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Next by Date: [lintian] 01/01: Warn about changelog files that are too short. Thanks to Adrian Bunk for the suggestion. (Closes: #890920)
Previous by thread: Bug#890959: lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology
Next by thread: Bug#890959: marked as done (lintian: inconsistent use of “header” terminology)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread