[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#890530: binary-package-depends-on-toolchain-package: missing word in description



Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.75
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


% lintian-info -t binary-package-depends-on-toolchain-package
W: binary-package-depends-on-toolchain-package
N:
N:   The package specifies a binary dependecy on a "toolchain" package such
N:   as debhelper or cdbs. This is likely to a mistake as these packages
N:   are typically specified as build-dependencis.
N:   
N:   If the package intentionally requires such a dependency, please add a
N:   Lintian override.
N:   
N:   Severity: normal, Certainty: possible
N:   
N:   Check: fields, Type: binary, udeb, source
N:

"This is likely to a mistake" looks incomplete; maybe "This is likely
to _be_ a mistake"? Or just "This is likely a mistake"?
The former sounds more idiomatic but I trust native speakers more
than myself on that :)


Cheers,
gregor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=d2AY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: