[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#889640: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop misfire on rcS scripts)



Your message dated Fri, 09 Feb 2018 03:02:24 +0530
with message-id <[🔎] 1518125544.2950310.1264553464.229D9106@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Re: lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop should special-case runlevel S scripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #820770,
regarding lintian: init.d-script-possible-missing-stop misfire on rcS scripts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
820770: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.72
Severity: normal

And one more for today's trifecta :)

A SysV init script with:

 # Default-Start:     S
 # Default-Stop:      0 6

Will cause lintian to complain about it not being stopped in runlevel 1,
with a rationale that would be fine for services started in 2-5, but that
doesn't really apply for things which can be shut down in an orderly way
but shouldn't be just because you're switching to or entering runlevel 1.

  Cheers,
  Ron

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 820770 - moreinfo
tags 820770 + wontfix
tags 889640 + wontfix
forcemerge 820770 889640
thanks

Hi Ron,

> I chatted with Felipe on IRC, and lintian is still right :)  So feel free
> to close/merge this one now too.

Thanks for following up. Hopefully I've got the control@ incantation
right above...


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

--- End Message ---

Reply to: