[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#882154: marked as done (lintian: Raise level for -dbg packages)

Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2017 03:03:40 +0000
with message-id <E1eInEK-00032F-CT@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#882154: fixed in lintian 2.5.60
has caused the Debian Bug report #882154,
regarding lintian: Raise level for -dbg packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882154: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.59
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

as you know the concept of manually maintained -dbg packages has been
superseeded by automatically created -dbgsym ones during the stretch
development cycle.

So I was about to propose a warning for -dbg packages just to find it's
already implemented as debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package - but
marked experimental.

In my opinion the severity should be raised, and actually above warning
level.

Related, unless there's still a situation where -dbg packages serve a
purpose - I'm not aware of such and cannot think of any either - I
wouldn't mind if ftp-master starts to autoreject such packages, perhaps
with NMUs as an exception.

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.60

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 882154@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 11:13:58 +0900
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.60
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Closes: 849514 881389 882154
Changes:
 lintian (2.5.60) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Summary of tag changes:
     + Added:
       - homepage-field-uses-insecure-uri
       - hyphen-file
       - rules-does-not-require-root
       - rules-requires-root-explicitly
 .
   * checks/control-file.{desc,pm}:
     + [AB] Add classification tags for R³.
     + [CL] Remove the "Experimental: yes" flag from the
       debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package tag.  (Closes: #882154)
     + [AB] Change reference for debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package
       from https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage to
       https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
   * checks/cruft.desc:
     + [CL] Add suggested [[:space:]]-based sed call for
       file-contains-trailing-whitespace. Thanks to Stuart Prescott.
       (Closes: #881389)
     + [AB] Also mention Emacs' "M-x wh-cl" (whitespace-cleanup) for
       file-contains-trailing-whitespace.
   * checks/fields.desc:
     + [CL] Warn for Homepage files using well-known insecure URIs.
       (Closes: #849514)
   * checks/files.pm:
     + [NT] Add missing slash for usr/sbin that caused lintian to report
       false-positive multiarch-foreign-shared-library when a package
       only had executables in usr/sbin.  Thanks to Helmut Grohne for
       reporting the issue.
     + [CL] Warn on files called "-" (hyphen symbol). See #882638 for an
       example.
   * checks/version-substvars.desc:
     + [CL] Don't recommend "Source-Version" in tag descriptions.
 .
   * data/fields/*:
     + [CL] Revert patch from Guillem Jover to add a "golang" archive
       section; it has not ben added to the archive yet.
   * data/spelling/corrections:
     + [PW] Add several corrections.
 .
   * lib/Test/Lintian/Harness.pm, t/runtests, t/tests/README:
     + [AB] Add support for a "Test-Conflicts" field.
 .
   * t/tests/rules-including-deprecated-makefiles/desc:
     + [AB] Add "Test-Conflict: dh-buildinfo". Having dh-buildinfo
       installed causes that test to fail.
 .
   * .gitignore:
     + [AB] Ignore /debian/.debhelper/ directory.
Checksums-Sha1:
 446862bd306cf019a972ad34dbd56b3ad6b5f3d2 2898 lintian_2.5.60.dsc
 7ef088dfc94b329737892a30e95ab2bd3b08072d 1247500 lintian_2.5.60.tar.xz
 41cb92ebca551b6e1e95eed59c7da942b77f21a0 16269 lintian_2.5.60_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 5752ed811a2e5d226bbcbd319663554493d3205ad0a6b2a1ecd9485d3cfe9726 2898 lintian_2.5.60.dsc
 3a53171bd9b1577b7ee005bb459befdd99f2345d9130c3bd59568f5f4c756116 1247500 lintian_2.5.60.tar.xz
 a2c2eb87a4fa3d49c96b5c92eca5cd4a8c60a787aac7eaca080432a3fae78e72 16269 lintian_2.5.60_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 9ff1f22e97c0442a20ec9485e948b1bd 2898 devel optional lintian_2.5.60.dsc
 6a16cf138ba4d2a988583aa318e5f166 1247500 devel optional lintian_2.5.60.tar.xz
 3d6de413a5d71e37c11cf9ec8ad1f5f1 16269 devel optional lintian_2.5.60_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEwv5L0nHBObhsUz5GHpU+J9QxHlgFAloaLBYACgkQHpU+J9Qx
Hlhkog//dKSjSgzhgr+ALXLhBsFJuLzsrwJzPxCNBA2AmtNA493/1uowlgXL9W5c
+DJDsAtAfX5hchhlfCLyvF+k9QSY+4sdrGZmT/DJ4sJXymwFYdffw1grQ7ES6eN7
WBH8uZ/pM7+MSUSP50LMaCWNvaZj9NyNeqw45tShQ2EXYIb+C7Gu4wOTF87o0e61
BlYM+TExvGhZ14lMfXgulLxzNvlT2ZPfOwhiUlj6IshgcAWJuTcu+hr/BvjnBDpi
P9BbqdfSkPtunAfZQAhcD8MA6qraoFG1yNA+lmivT8Cej03oVlr+7aSY9M+nmfsi
b3HCX9YiC6bgYmRVFlXhAUce18wwppgtiaoSquuXg/vNcmvgY5javAdmyu3zvzN3
5bVir8esvw0pKbFjEelKKFm6gOnrk8WDlOhmepMdKZLQ8jc5sQeV4Kv94nwxS9Ct
XwIWM2e696DIVNan4QGI3crCSf8yLS3EwGN8EdRrtZqFWbdEX0tUlnHcgaxrYLLW
uJclQEmg6TwMa/8+NbDQaYOKx2TdqNoxY8mtHGnf1XNOGli7WytK1TZepbaoAlhz
jxWvFBz/14OwsdB5XxzkaNmu2mjE7ewjQcZUQx0742zPHlwLWgdRE5yicuN+yL5T
6GLD7b9YWinBsX+asrnO94Q4vxkk1qKQy/sYQRzxMEO0se6qqAg=
=bgU4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: