[lintian] 02/02: Allow trailing tabs in debian/rules files; they are very common in Makefiles.
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
lamby pushed a commit to branch master
in repository lintian.
commit 61eef5b213d61680cfd211c8e6dfce4d5f50eaf9
Author: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Wed Nov 1 12:37:19 2017 +0100
Allow trailing tabs in debian/rules files; they are very common in Makefiles.
---
checks/cruft.pm | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 2 ++
t/tests/cruft-file-contains-trailing-whitespace/debian/debian/rules | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/checks/cruft.pm b/checks/cruft.pm
index ae5a52f..7524103 100644
--- a/checks/cruft.pm
+++ b/checks/cruft.pm
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ our @EOL_TERMINATORS_FILES = qw(control changelog);
our @TRAILING_WHITESPACE_FILES = (
['debian/changelog' => qr,\s+\n$,],
['debian/control' => qr,\s+\n$,],
- ['debian/rules' => qr,\s+\n$,],
+ ['debian/rules' => qr,[ ]+\n$,], # Allow trailing tabs in Make
);
sub run {
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d8bae89..4576a65 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ lintian (2.5.58) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* checks/cruft.pm
+ [CL] Rewrite file-contains-trailing-whitespace tag to be hash from
filename to the regex we should match.
+ + [CL] Allow trailing tabs in debian/rules files; they are very common
+ in Makefiles.
* checks/fields.desc:
+ [SL] Update of the documentation for the change introduced in 2.5.53:
Transitional packages should now be "oldlibs/optional" rather
diff --git a/t/tests/cruft-file-contains-trailing-whitespace/debian/debian/rules b/t/tests/cruft-file-contains-trailing-whitespace/debian/debian/rules
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..f72af4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/tests/cruft-file-contains-trailing-whitespace/debian/debian/rules
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+#!/usr/bin/make -f
+
+%:
+ dh $@
+ # The line contains a trailing tab (false-positive)
+
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git
Reply to: