Hi Mattia,
> Dunno if this is the case, but would be possible to at least keep it for
> some cases
[…]
Whilst this is certainly possible I just can't shake the feeling that
this tag isn't actually finding "real" bugs in packages worth of the
investment.
Sure, a typo of 2117 instead of 2017 is objectively "wrong" but whilst
I am not a lawyer (I just play one on TV, etc. etc.) no court anywhere
in the world is going to rule against someone on the basis of such an
obvious typo.
Thus, I think the Lintian developers' precious hours are better spent
elsewhere and not playing whack-a-mole with this tag, and that's not
taking into consideration the time or annoyance this tag can cause or
has already caused regular developers.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-