Processed: Re: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 22:45:05 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.151458739525180.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 1514587393.4162192.1219166632.3BCB51DE@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 702349 + moreinfo
Bug #702349 [lintian] lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
702349: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml
Next by Date: Bug#710559: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-call-internal-API should document replacement (remove checks for $VERBOSE and use log_* functions))
Previous by thread: Bug#702349: lintian should not complain about hardening for package written in pure Ocaml
Next by thread: Bug#710559: marked as done (lintian: init.d-script-call-internal-API should document replacement (remove checks for $VERBOSE and use log_* functions))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread