Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: 835120@bugs.debian.org, Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director
From: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:11:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87fubhhh05.fsf@arioch.leonhardt.eu>
Reply-to: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>, 835120@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1505857049.1377107.1111680936.2101233D@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Chris Lamb's message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:37:29 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 1505857049.1377107.1111680936.2101233D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87zio4d8k9.fsf@arioch.leonhardt.eu>

Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> writes:

> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
>> trying to regenerate [the list] drops the bacula-director and
>> bacula-sd-tools packages and adds bacula-director-database.
>
> Is that incorrect?

No, that would be correct.

Regards,

Carsten

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1934
Next by Date: [lintian] 01/01: Revert "spelling: Add another correction"
Previous by thread: Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director
Next by thread: Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread