Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: 874381@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js
From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:05:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20170906210541.rwcpsmokpsq7oqjr@d-and-j.net>
Reply-to: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>, 874381@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1504647238.1443628.1096330368.060143B6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <[🔎] 1504647238.1443628.1096330368.060143B6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 150462757858.21303.5351807936039137940.reportbug@erdos.d-and-j.net>

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:33:58PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 874381 + pending
> thanks
> 
> Fixed in Git:
> 
>   https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=72d95b8ee796cafcdc05d4c612d1b435b9c37302

I wonder whether the patch should check for css_browser_selector (the
function name) rather than 'css browser selector' (the title)?

Best wishes,

   Julian

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js
  - From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js
  - From: Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lintian] Membership audit and clean up - please follow up if you are still active
Next by Date: [lintian] branch master updated (72d95b8 -> 8a3ec28)
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js
Next by thread: Bug#874381: lintian: false-positive source-is-missing bug for css_browser_selector.js
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread