Your message dated Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:28:32 +0100 with message-id <1499894912.715708.1039042584.44B0BDA3@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: explain spelling-error-in-description for 'allow to' has caused the Debian Bug report #795158, regarding explain spelling-error-in-description for 'allow to' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 795158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795158 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: explain spelling-error-in-description for 'allow to'
- From: chrysn <chrysn@fsfe.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:56:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20150811075611.GA25721@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.34 Severity: minor The spelling-error-in-description correction "Allow to" -> "Allow one to" is hard to understand without further explanation. With openscad, it reports the "Allow to open multiple files" menu line. I've checked with several native speakers and a dictionary, and nothing gives me an indication on 'allow to' being wrong; at best, people have suggested "Allow opening multiple files", but on a "either would work" basis. The report overview shows that the 'allow' case makes up roughly half of the spelling-error-in-description cases. Could you clarify on this? Thanks chrysnAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 795158-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: chrysn <chrysn@fsfe.org>
- Subject: Re: explain spelling-error-in-description for 'allow to'
- From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:28:32 +0100
- Message-id: <1499894912.715708.1039042584.44B0BDA3@webmail.messagingengine.com>
tags 795158 + wontfix thanks Hi chrysn, > explain spelling-error-in-description for 'allow to' As the consensus appears to be that "allow to" is incorrect (and I agree!) I am going to go ahead and close this bug. Thank you so much for reporting and caring :) Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb, Debian Project Leader `. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
--- End Message ---