On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 20:37 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > But they don't hurt either. So I'd say this should be P(edantic) or > (I)nformational at most. Agreed. > P.S.: I assume there's no chance that upstream will ever come back, > right? Canonical/Ubuntu was upstream for upstart and since Ubuntu switched to systemd by default, it is unlikely that they would revive upstart, but it could happen if systemd became problematic I guess. That said upstart is still in Ubuntu and still seems to get commits though. http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=upstart https://code.launchpad.net/upstart -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part