Is restriction-formula-with-versioned-dpkg-dev-conflict useful?
Description for restriction-formula-with-versioned-dpkg-dev-conflict reads:
If a restriction formula appears in the build dependencies or if the 
Build-Profiles field is used in a binary package stanza then the source 
package has to build depend on dpkg-dev (>= 1.17.14) for minimal 
restriction formula support.
So far so good, but we have a separate tag 
(restriction-formula-without-versioned-dpkg-dev-dependency) for 
checking Build-Depends.
It must not conflict with version 1.17.14.
But why would anyone have Build-Conflicts on dpkg-dev?
What about versions later than 1.17.14?
In the current implementation, the tag is triggered for these 
Build-Conflicts:
  dpkg-dev (<< 1)
  dpkg-dev (>= 2)
  dpkg-dev (= 1.18.1)
which doesn't make any sense to me. :-\
Unless someone objects, I'm going to remove this tag, because it's 
confusing and unlikely to detect any real problem...
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to: