On 2015-08-31 11:12, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, 2015-08-31, 07:39: >>> I would have no idea what this tag is about if I didn't look at the >>> code. It triggers when the package include files in >>> /var/cache/pbuilder/build/ or /var/lib/sbuild/ or /var/lib/buildd/. >>> >>> But... how could it even happen that you ship stuff in any of these >>> directories by accident? This doesn't seem plausible to me. >> >> I am afraid it is very plausible. Between May 18th 2013 and Sep 21. >> 2013 we had instances of this tag on lintian.d.o. > > OK, I stand corrected. > > Where did you get this information? lindsay.d.o:/srv/lintian.debian.org/history/tags/<tag-name>.dat > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/dir-or-file-in-build-tree.html says that > tag has not been emitted. > This is because the graphs only go back one year. Although, I admit, I am not sure how the site handles corner cases like the last tag disappearing. Furthermore, this tag is currently on the "fatal" auto-reject list, so it is difficult reintroduce. > I'm still curious to know how could it happen. > I do not remember how or what happened. I can trace the tag back to #678857, which includes Andreas Beckmann quoting me from IRC: """ <nthykier> we occasially [sic!] also see buildd paths as well """ Though I still cannot remember the concrete case and a quick googling did not help either. Thanks, ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature