Bug#787853: lintian: Do not complain about lack of LFS from local implementations
On 2015-07-22 14:14, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Another (additional) limitation could be to limit the version to ^GLIBC_
>> as all the symbols for the LFS check come from GLIBC.
>>
>> With this patch the inetutils-ftpd package is no longer marked with
>> binary-file-built-without-LFS-support while havp is still marked.
> ^^^^
>
> s/havp/have/
>
>>
>> [...]
Silly me, that was a package name and not a typo of "have"!
Reply to: