[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#776796: marked as done (lintian: False positive unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright)



Your message dated Tue, 3 Feb 2015 00:01:11 +0100
with message-id <CAE2SPAbH4TfuuSNXb9pCYimn5HeL7MA8hfyh8jms+xh11OPmCA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#776796: lintian: False positive unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
has caused the Debian Bug report #776796,
regarding lintian: False positive unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
776796: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Lintian is returning a false positive unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
exactly when at the first paragraph in the Files field debian/* is specified. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_GT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_GT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.25-4
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-7+b2
ii  diffstat                       1.58-1
ii  file                           1:5.22+15-1
ii  gettext                        0.19.3-2
ii  hardening-includes             2.7
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.1
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.29+b2
ii  libarchive-zip-perl            1.39-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.37-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.17.23
ii  libemail-valid-perl            1.195-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl           0.03-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                0.92-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl         0.33-2+b1
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-1.1
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl       0.11-1
ii  libtimedate-perl               2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl                    1.64-1
ii  man-db                         2.7.0.2-5
ii  patchutils                     0.3.3-1
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.20.1-4
ii  t1utils                        1.38-3+b1

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
pn  libperlio-gzip-perl             <none>
ii  perl                            5.20.1-4
ii  perl-modules [libautodie-perl]  5.20.1-4

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn  binutils-multiarch     <none>
ii  dpkg-dev               1.17.23
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.71-1+b3
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.46-1
ii  libyaml-perl           1.13-1
ii  xz-utils               5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Close now

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> wrote:
> * Josue Ortega <josueortega@debian.org.gt>, 2015-02-01, 17:17:
>>>>
>>>> Lintian is returning a false positive
>>>> unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright exactly when at the first paragraph
>>>> in the Files field debian/* is specified.
>>>
>>>
>>> Without a concrete example, I can only guess that you did something like
>>> this:
>>>
>>> Files: debian/*
>>> Copyright: 2015 Random Developer <randomdd@debian.org>
>>> License: FooPL
>>>
>>> Files: *
>>> Copyright: 2015 Random Hacker <hacker@example.net>
>>> License: BarPL
>>>
>>>
>>> Here the following rule matters: "The last paragraph that matches a
>>> particular file applies to it." And since the last paragraph matches
>>> everything, the first one is unused.
>>>
>>> The solution is to reorder the paragraphs: "More general paragraphs
>>> should therefore be given first, followed by more specific overrides."
>
> [...]
>>
>>
>> Is this a new behaviour? since it's the first time I see it with this
>> copyright file and I hadn't it changed it for a while.
>
>
> This tag was added in Lintian 2.5.26, released in September 2014. But the
> copyright format specification had the rule about the paragraph order at
> least since 2011.
>
> --
> Jakub Wilk
>

--- End Message ---

Reply to: