[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#774381: marked as done (lintian: False positives for binary-control-field-duplicates-source)



Your message dated Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:44:35 +0100
with message-id <54A7ABF3.6050002@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#774381: lintian: False positives for binary-control-field-duplicates-source
has caused the Debian Bug report #774381,
regarding lintian: False positives for binary-control-field-duplicates-source
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
774381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u3
Severity: normal

Hi,

The lintian tag "binary-control-field-duplicates-source" reports an error when
there is a duplicate of the "section" field. However, it is often necessary to
duplicate the section field. For example:

Package: libxyz0
Section: libs

Package: libxyz-common
Section: libs

Package: libxyz-dev
Section: libdevel

Package: libxyz-doc
Section: doc


I propose that this tag not be output for the section tag.

Yours sincerely,

Riley Baird



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.24.90.20141209-1
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-7+b2
ii  diffstat                       1.58-1
ii  file                           1:5.20-2
ii  gettext                        0.19.3-2
ii  hardening-includes             2.7
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.1
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.29+b2
ii  libarchive-zip-perl            1.39-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.37-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.17.22
ii  libemail-valid-perl            1.195-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl           0.03-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                0.92-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl         0.33-2+b1
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-1.1
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl       0.11-1
ii  libtimedate-perl               2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl                    1.64-1
ii  man-db                         2.7.0.2-4
ii  patchutils                     0.3.3-1
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.20.1-3
ii  t1utils                        1.38-3

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libautodie-perl                 2.25-1
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl             0.18-3+b1
ii  perl                            5.20.1-3
ii  perl-modules [libautodie-perl]  5.20.1-3

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn  binutils-multiarch     <none>
ii  dpkg-dev               1.17.22
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.71-1+b3
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.46-1
pn  libyaml-perl           <none>
ii  xz-utils               5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-01-01 22:38, Riley Baird wrote:
> On 02/01/15 08:18, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe you might misunderstand the tag.  The case you describe do not
>> trigger this tag.  Instead, what you have is probably:
>>
>> """
>> *Source*: libxyz
>> Section: libs
>>
>> Package: libxyz0
>> Section: libs
>> """
>>
>> By default, the Section field will copied into the Binary paragraph *if*
>> the binary paragraph does not have it.  As the Binary paragraph has a
>> Section field with identical value to the one in *Source* it is
>> therefore redundant.  That is what this tag warns about.
>>
>> ~Niels
> 
> You're exactly right. Thanks for finding the error.
> 
> 

You are welcome, :)

Thanks for the follow-up, I will close the bug now.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: