On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:22:23 -0500, Chris Knadle wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:15:16AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > And "copyright 1.0" doesn't seem more clear to me at all. If > > anything, we should do s/dep5-copyright/machine-readable-copyright/. > machine-readable-copyright seems clearer to me too. For my personal taste, machine-readable was and is a mis-nomer. In my personal experience I find CF 1.0 much more _human_-readable as well than any unstructured prose in d/copyright. My personal favourite would be something like "structured copyright format". Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Cat Stevens: I Wish, I Wish
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature