[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#766118: lintian: False positive for “missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright”



On 20-Oct-2014, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't see any problem with Lintian 2.5.28, and I see on the Lintian
> report page that it was processed with Lintian 2.5.26.

I see the problem with Lintian 2.5.28::

=====
$ lintian --version
Lintian v2.5.28
$ lintian ../build-area/lojban-common_1.5+dfsg.1-2.dsc 
W: lojban-common source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public-domain (paragraph at line 43)
=====

just as in the online Lintian log.

Why would your Lintian and mine report the same version, but get
different results operating on ‘lojban-common’ at the same Debian
release?

-- 
 \        “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. |
  `\  Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: