Your message dated Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:02:10 -0400 with message-id <20140921020210.GA20774@freya.jamessan.com> and subject line Re: Bug#748465: remove debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle has caused the Debian Bug report #748465, regarding remove debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: =?utf-8?q?Repacked_tarballs_don=E2=80=99t_get_a_+dfsg_suffix_anymo?= =?utf-8?q?re?=
- From: David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 08:58:24 -0400
- Message-id: <20140517125824.GA24004@persil.tilapin.org>
Package: devscripts Version: 2.14.2 Severity: normal User: devscripts@packages.debian.org Usertags: uscan Hi When an upstream tarball is implicitly repacked, thanks to a Files-Excluded field in d/copyright, the resulted tarball is not renamed with a +dfsg suffix, while it was with the previous devscripts version. Regards David -- Package-specific info: --- /etc/devscripts.conf --- --- ~/.devscripts --- DEBSIGN_KEYID=B82A217AFDFE09F2 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-rt-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages devscripts depends on: ii dpkg-dev 1.17.9 ii libc6 2.18-6 ii perl 5.18.2-4 ii python3 3.3.4-1 pn python3:any <none> Versions of packages devscripts recommends: ii at 3.1.14-1 ii curl 7.36.0-2 ii dctrl-tools 2.23 ii debian-keyring 2014.04.25 ii dput 0.9.6.4 ii equivs 2.0.9 ii fakeroot 1.20-3 ii file 1:5.18-1 ii gnupg 1.4.16-1.1 ii libdistro-info-perl 0.13 ii libencode-locale-perl 1.03-1 ii libjson-perl 2.61-1 ii liblwp-protocol-https-perl 6.04-3 ii libparse-debcontrol-perl 2.005-4 ii libsoap-lite-perl 1.11-1 ii liburi-perl 1.60-1 ii libwww-perl 6.06-1 ii lintian 2.5.22.1 ii man-db 2.6.7.1-1 ii patch 2.7.1-5 ii patchutils 0.3.3-1 ii python3-debian 0.1.21+nmu3 ii python3-magic 1:5.18-1 ii sensible-utils 0.0.9 ii strace 4.5.20-2.3 ii unzip 6.0-12 ii wdiff 1.2.1-3 ii wget 1.15-1 ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 Versions of packages devscripts suggests: ii bsd-mailx [mailx] 8.1.2-0.20131005cvs-1 ii build-essential 11.6 pn cvs-buildpackage <none> pn devscripts-el <none> ii gnuplot 4.6.5-1 ii gpgv 1.4.16-1.1 ii libauthen-sasl-perl 2.1600-1 ii libfile-desktopentry-perl 0.07-1 ii libnet-smtp-ssl-perl 1.01-3 pn libterm-size-perl <none> ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2 ii libyaml-syck-perl 1.27-2+b1 ii mutt 1.5.23-1 ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:6.6p1-5 pn svn-buildpackage <none> ii w3m 0.5.3-15 -- no debconf informationAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>, 748465-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>, David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#748465: remove debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle
- From: James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:02:10 -0400
- Message-id: <20140921020210.GA20774@freya.jamessan.com>
- In-reply-to: <1400750388.2242.39.camel@kirk>
- References: <1395097522.26098.11.camel@kirk> <20140520171001.GA23273@an3as.eu> <1400622969.12153.14.camel@kirk> <20140521012532.GA1354@jamessan.com> <20140521065906.GD23273@an3as.eu> <1400656045.2255.1.camel@kirk> <20140521201539.GA26453@mikado.tilapin.org> <1400712341.3143.4.camel@kirk> <20140522081935.GG21394@an3as.eu> <1400750388.2242.39.camel@kirk>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:19:48AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2014, 10:19 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > We could actually close the bug ... or me reassign the problem to > > lintian. (Could anybody do this since I'll go offline quite soon for > > about one week.) > > I agree that this warning (it’s I only anyways) is invalid now. The > justification on https://wiki.debian.org/DEHS says > > However, using uversionmangle to add the 'dfsg' part to the > upstream version should not be considered as correct. This is > based on the idea that downloading the upstream sources won't > make it DFSG-free, so upstream's version is not DFSG-free but > Debian's is. In other words: uversionmangle=s//+dfsg/ is not > correct, dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// is. > > but with the new features (and Files-Excluded in place), running uscan > yields a DFSG-free tarball. uversionmangle is always applied to the version number, regardless of whether Files-Excluded rules are applied. They are two separates pieces of functionality. In the upcoming 2.14.7 devscripts upload, there will be a repacksuffix option that can be used in the watch file to define how upstream versions should be modified, iff the upstream source is changed. For these two reasons, I'm closing this bug as the Lintian tag is still valid. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---