Bug#721458: marked as done (lintian.debian.org: too sticky tags?)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:45:49 +0200
with message-id <53C2E1ED.7000107@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#660732: [reporting/harness]: allow re-checking packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #660732,
regarding lintian.debian.org: too sticky tags?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
660732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660732
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: lintian.debian.org: too sticky tags?
- From: Niko Tyni <ntyni@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 22:02:24 +0300
- Message-id: <20130831190224.GA23212@madeleine.local.invalid>
Package: lintian
Severity: minor
Hi,
the lintian.debian.org page at
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-superseded-by-perl.html
states that libversion-perl 1:0.9902-1 triggers the
package-superseded-by-perl tag, but that was an error and supposedly
got fixed in 2.5.15. I don't get the tag when running lintian manually
on libversion-perl_0.9902-1_amd64.deb here.
It looks like the tag is sticking on the web site even when it's not
really triggered anymore?
(Hope this is the right place for such a report. Feel free to educate me
if it isn't.)
--
Niko Tyni ntyni@debian.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 660732-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#660732: [reporting/harness]: allow re-checking packages
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:45:49 +0200
- Message-id: <53C2E1ED.7000107@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <4F4379A1.3060402@thykier.net>
- References: <4F4379A1.3060402@thykier.net>
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.21
On 2012-02-21 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> I think it would be useful if harness had an "reschedule-all" option
> that slowly re-runs already checked packages over several
> days/incremental runs. Either by limiting the time (e.g. spend 1-2
> hours rechecking packages) or by package count (e.g. recheck 500
> packages) or maybe by some third metric.
>
> This would allow us to upgrade lintian on lintian.d.o, ask harness to
> reschedule packages and still get daily updates. In contrast to now
> where lintian.d.o is "frozen" for 3-4 days while the full run completes.
>
> In fact, I think our "current full run" would be better implemented as
> the above. I suspect piuparts have something similar (based on some of
> its "state" graphs[1]).
>
> ~Niels
>
> [1] http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze2wheezy/states.png
>
> Notice how the "red" (dependency-failed-testing) part is replaced by
> "yellow" (waiting-for-dependency-to-be-tested).
>
Has been implemented since 2.5.21, closing now.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: