On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> wrote: > That is correct, and I'm not arguing with that. It makes only sense > for packages that only execute avconv, and do link against directly > against libavcodec. This was the case for #748546. Sorry, that meant to be read as ... and do NOT link against libavcodec ... sorry for the confusion. Reinhard