Bug#736203: lintian: id3v22-tda.mp3 considered non-free
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.21
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
While working with the ftpmaster on getting pytaglib into the archive the
ftpmasters have deemed the file id3v22-tda.mp3 to be non-free content.
This file is also in the source package taglib and I have reported #736118
against taglib for it's removal.
It would be nice if there was a lintian check to check for this file.
md5sum
356b779a06c228895d3228fc1ee1355c id3v22-tda.mp3
sha1sum
e6ccaa38bf5eb9a3c4f1c667d414eda8358c8d7c id3v22-tda.mp3
sha256sum
298586eced80f0f99adb3e5252a16b64bcc11aa833e50772be1ffda25c6e8925
id3v22-tda.mp3
Thanks
Charlie Smotherman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.24-2
ii bzip2 1.0.6-5
ii diffstat 1.58-1
ii file 1:5.14-2
ii gettext 0.18.3.1-2
ii hardening-includes 2.5
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.29+b1
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.30-7
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1
ii libclone-perl 0.36-1
ii libdpkg-perl 1.17.5
ii libemail-valid-perl 1.192-1
ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.03-1
ii libipc-run-perl 0.92-1
ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.33-1+b2
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1
ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.06~01-2
ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-1
ii liburi-perl 1.60-1
ii man-db 2.6.5-3
ii patchutils 0.3.2-3
ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.18.1-5
ii t1utils 1.37-2
Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii libautodie-perl 2.21-1
ii libperlio-gzip-perl 0.18-1+b3
ii perl-modules [libautodie-perl] 5.18.1-5
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none>
ii dpkg-dev 1.17.5
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.71-1+b1
pn libtext-template-perl <none>
pn libyaml-perl <none>
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2
-- no debconf information
Reply to: