Hey Niels, > I have been thinking about this some more and I have come to the > conclusion that we cannot ensure packages are Lintian clean in "both > use-cases". For many checks, we might be able to do it, but there are > some where the output associated with the check depends on the packages > involved in the check. > > Take "intra-source-package-circular-dependency" as an example. And that > (in theory) gets even more "fun" if you start processing binaries from > multiple architectures together (like we do on lintian.d.o). So at this > time, I am going to say "cantfix" to this. Makes sense. Thanks for considering, though :-) Gr. Matthijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature