Bug#681616: lintian: False positive: unused-license-paragraph.. when two licenses are given and described in different places

[Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>]

Niels Thykier dixit:

>If there are no remaining lines, [...]. Otherwise, this field should
>either include the full text of the license(s) or include a pointer to
>the license file under /usr/share/common-licenses. [...]

Ah so this is an either-or.

>license in /usr/share/common-licenses).  The remark you have in your
>file should probably be moved to another field (e.g. Comment).  You need

OK Nik, please do so for the next resubmit ;)

Thanks Niels. (I don’t use DEP-5 myself, so I’m not “fluent”.)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
20:49⎜«Natureshadow» Oops, jetzt hab ich mir doch glatt beim Trinken
     ⎜    Mineralwasser ins Ohr gekippt…
21:04⎜«mirabilos» ist das siggbar?	█ PS: سمَـَّوُوُحخ ̷̴خ ̷̴خ ̷̴خ امارتيخ ̷̴خ
21:05⎜«Natureshadow» mirabilos: was sollte dich davon abhalten…