Summary of current experimental tags
Hey,
I did a bit of research on our current experimental tags... and they are
all "old"[1]. :P
>From 2011 we got:
* python(3)-depends-but-no-python(3)-helper 2.5.4 (Nov 2011)
- In total, some 40-46 cases
- both tags are "serious/possible" (E)
- I am considering to promote to "non-experimental".
* package-contains-no-arch-dependent-files
- some 250 tags in ~125 packages
- I don't think it copes with "pkg [linux-any]" cases
(i.e. where the package is arch:any to allow architecture dependent
dependencies).
- It is minor/possible (I)
- Maybe promote to non-experimental
(possibly with a s/possible/wild-guess/)
* package-contains-broken-symlink
- nearly 12k tags in < 1000 packages
- people seem to symlink the "weirdest" of things.
- I am no so certain that maintaining the whitelist we are doing now
will remain feasible.
- it is normal/possible (W)
- I am considering to drop it.
* duplicate-files
- Some 35k tags in < 1000 packages
- a lot of that is caused by doxygen (etc.)
- will possibly be preceived as a lot of busy work by maintainers
- dedup.debian.net is (likely to become) a good replacement for this.
- I am considering to drop it.
We also got a few from 2008:
* embedded-pear-module
- Some 35 tags
- Accuracy could probably be improved (e.g. php-horde-mime)
- maybe talk with the php/pear maintainers here to confirm the
accuracy (and possible updating its "list of libraries")
- it is normal/possible (W)
* shlib-calls-exit
- Some 2300 tags in < 1000 packages
- Russ suggested that this tag should be dropped[2].
- it is wishlist/possible (I)
Comments appreciated.
~Niels
[1] Except binary-file-built-without-LFS-support, which is not in any
released version ... yet.
[2] <87boffx3ih.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Reply to: