Bug#681616: lintian: False positive: unused-license-paragraph.. when two licenses are given and described in different places
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.17
Followup-For: Bug #681616
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
The bug also exists for the construct "License: Foo or Bar" with two
License paragraphs Foo and Bar.
It appears that intian completely ignores the alternative names syntax
described in DEP5.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.23.52.20130828-1
ii bzip2 1.0.6-5
ii diffstat 1.55-3
ii file 1:5.14-2
ii gettext 0.18.3.1-1
ii hardening-includes 2.3
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.29
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.30-7
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1
ii libclone-perl 0.34-1
ii libdpkg-perl 1.17.1
ii libemail-valid-perl 0.190-1
ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.03-1
ii libipc-run-perl 0.92-1
ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.33-1+b1
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1
ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.06~01-2
ii libtimedate-perl 1.2000-1
ii liburi-perl 1.60-1
ii man-db 2.6.5-2
ii patchutils 0.3.2-2
ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.14.2-21
ii t1utils 1.37-2
Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii libautodie-perl 2.20-1
ii libperlio-gzip-perl 0.18-1+b2
ii perl-modules [libautodie-perl] 5.14.2-21
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none>
ii dpkg-dev 1.17.1
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.71-1
ii libtext-template-perl 1.45-2
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)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=3SL5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: