Re: Spell checking of POD documentation

[Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>]

On 2013-06-21 23:32, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, 2013-04-20, 20:40:
>>> "Whitespaces" is almost always incorrect:
>>> http://lists.debian.org/516540D4.2000401@debian.org
>> Thanks, removed from the whitelist.
> 
> Unfortunately we have a few tags that use this spelling:
> 
>     doc-base-abstract-might-contain-extra-leading-whitespaces
>     doc-base-abstract-field-separator-extra-whitespaces
>     doc-base-file-separator-extra-whitespaces
> 
> Speaking of misspelled tags, we have:
> 
>     md5sums-lists-nonexisting-file
> 
> which should really be:
> 
>     md5sums-lists-nonexistent-file
> 

All 4 renamed

> Also, we should probably decide on one spelling of "unpars(e)able":
> 
>     apache2-unparseable-dependency
>     unparsable-menu-item
> 

Going with unparsable; apache2-unparseable-dependency had no overrides
(and in fact no emitted tags at all).

On a related note, POD documentation is now also spell checked.  Sorry
for the delay in deploying that.  :)

~Niels