[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#201157: marked as done ([external] check for progs under /(s)bin using libs from /usr/lib)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:52:59 +0200
with message-id <51ED2B2B.2070909@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#201157: lintian should have a check for progs under /(s)bin using libs from /usr/lib
has caused the Debian Bug report #201157,
regarding [external] check for progs under /(s)bin using libs from /usr/lib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
201157: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=201157
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 1.22.8.1
Severity: normal

lintian should have a check that gives an error if a program under
/(s)bin uses a library under /usr/lib since this doesn't make sense.

An example for such a broken program:

<--  snip  -->

$ ldd /sbin/discover 
        libdiscover.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdiscover.so.1 (0x4001e000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4002f000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40050000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
$ 

<--  snip  -->

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2013-03-25 16:48, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, 2003-07-14, 01:11:
>> lintian should have a check that gives an error if a program under
>> /(s)bin uses a library under /usr/lib since this doesn't make sense.
>>
>> An example for such a broken program:
>>
>> <--  snip  -->
>>
>> $ ldd /sbin/discover
>>        libdiscover.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdiscover.so.1 (0x4001e000)
>>        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4002f000)
>>        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40050000)
>>        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> 
> FYI, adequate[0] has a check for this, and there are plans to make
> piuparts use it[1].
> 
> 
> [0] http://packages.debian.org/sid/adequate
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/703902
> 

Punting this check to piuparts+adequate then and closing.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: