[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626454: lintian: False positive: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl

Hi Lintian guys,

I think I've spotted another false positive for "copyright-should-refer-to-
common-license-file-for-gpl" check.

In Rhino package (under MPL-2.0 licence [1]), full licence text contains the 
following section :
------
1.12. "Secondary License"
    means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU
    Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General
    Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those
    licenses.
------
This section seems to trigger "copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-
for-gpl" check.


[1] 
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/rhino/rhino_1.7R4-1/copyright
-- 
Damien - Debian Developper
http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: