[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#698667: Gfdl improve



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2013-01-28 21:21, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> From b136d3ecb257b408381e31ac4a2ebbe1ca87ab99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Bastien=20ROUCARI=C3=88S?= <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:59:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Detect empty gfdl statement about invariant sections.
> 
> gfdl requests to explicitly mark that you have not invariant section by writing
> text like this:
> "with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts."
> 
> Some author instead use empty text. Detect this usage.
> ---
>  [...]
> --- a/t/tests/cruft-gfdl-invariants/tags
> +++ b/t/tests/cruft-gfdl-invariants/tags
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants src/empty.texi
> +E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants src/emptybis.texi
   ^                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is not the newly introduced tag and no later patch corrects it.
Thus I suspect the code has a bug.

>  E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants src/frontback.html
>  E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants src/frontback.texi
>  E: cruft-gfdl-invariants source: license-problem-gfdl-invariants src/invariant.txt
> -- 1.7.10.4

~Niels


Reply to: