[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#513544: lintian: pedantic 'no-upstream-changelog' should check if upsteam changelog is not empty



On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:34:35 +0100 Sandro Tosi wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:31, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> > Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> writes:
> >> Hello,
> >> since dh_installchangelog skips empty upsteam changelog files, so the
> >> pedantic tag should be not shown in that situation.

Hello, I've just been hit by this bug.

I was running lintian on a package where the upstream changelog is
present but empty and I failed to understand how I could fix the
problem with the package, until I realized that the lintian complaint
was actually a false positive.

I checked the list of open bug reports for lintian and found that the
issue has already been reported.

I hope this bug may be fixed soon (well, of course, not during a
freeze, but, soon after the release of wheezy!).

> >
> > I don't see any good way for Lintian to do that.  It's checking the binary
> > package to see if an upstream changelog was installed and doesn't know
> > what was in the source package (and a source package check wouldn't know
> > whether an upstream changelog was being installed or not).
> 
> Not a problem, feel free to close or wontfix :)

No, please!
Don't close it as invalid and don't tag it wontfix!
Please, pretty please, implement the necessary check to exclude this
kind of false positives...

The blocking bug (#513663) is long fixed now.
Hence, it is my understanding that the needed architecture is in place.


Thanks for your time!
Bye.

-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpId3_66ZVCR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: