Bug#687141: lintian: [checks/scripts] python-script-but-no-python-dep: contradictory description.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10.1
Severity: normal
Dear Lintian maintainers,
About the following tag:
E: python-script-but-no-python-dep
N:
N: Packages with Python scripts should depend on the package python.
N: Those with scripts that specify a specific version of Python must
N: depend on that version of Python (exactly).
N:
N: For example, if a script in the package uses #!/usr/bin/python, the
N: package needs a dependency on python. If a script uses
N: #!/usr/bin/python2.6, the package needs a dependency on python2.6. A
N: dependency on python (>= 2.6) is not correct, since later versions of
N: Python may not provide the /usr/bin/python2.6 binary.
N:
N: If you are using debhelper, adding ${python:Depends} to the Depends
N: field and ensuring dh_pysupport or dh_pycentral are run during the
N: build should take care of adding the correct dependency.
N:
N: In some cases a weaker relationship, such as Suggests or Recommends,
N: will be more appropriate.
N:
N: Severity: important, Certainty: certain
N:
N: Check: scripts, Type: binary
The description says: Severity: important, Certainty: certain, and the
tag is classified as an error, but on the other hand the description also
contains:
In some cases a weaker relationship, such as Suggests or Recommends,
will be more appropriate.
This creates confusion in team-maintained packages, as it is hard to
conclude from this description whether there is a problem or not.
How about either downgrading the importance, severity or certainty of
that tag, or change the check so that it also tolerates recommends or
suggests on python ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: