[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#674004: marked as done (lintian: doc-base-unknown-section Video should be known)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:22:47 +0200
with message-id <4FFC2CA7.10102@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#674004: lintian: doc-base-unknown-section Video should be known
has caused the Debian Bug report #674004,
regarding lintian: doc-base-unknown-section Video should be known
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
674004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.7
Severity: minor

While working on a new version of the package photofilmstrip I came across this lintian hint:
W: photofilmstrip: doc-base-unknown-section photofilmstrip:5 Video

Checking the available documentation and running
install-docs --verbose --check debian/photofilmstrip.doc-base
show that "Video" is indeed a valid section, hence Lintian is wrong.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (250, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.22-6
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-1
ii  diffstat                       1.55-2
ii  file                           5.11-1
ii  gettext                        0.18.1.1-8
ii  hardening-includes             2.1
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.1
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.26+b1
ii  libc-bin                       2.13-32
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.31-1+b2
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.16.3
ii  libemail-valid-perl            0.190-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                0.91-1
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-1
ii  libtimedate-perl               1.2000-1
ii  liburi-perl                    1.60-1
ii  locales                        2.13-32
ii  locales-all [locales]          2.13-32
ii  man-db                         2.6.1-2
ii  patchutils                     0.3.2-1.1
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.14.2-10
ii  unzip                          6.0-6

lintian recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch     <none>
ii  dpkg-dev               1.16.3
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.69-2
ii  libtext-template-perl  <none>
ii  man-db                 2.6.1-2
ii  xz-utils               5.1.1alpha+20110809-3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2012-05-23 20:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
> tags 674004 + unreproducible
> thanks
> 
> 
> On 2012-05-22 15:23, Philipp Huebner wrote:
>> Package: lintian
>> Version: 2.5.7
>> Severity: minor
>>
>> While working on a new version of the package photofilmstrip I came across this lintian hint:
>> W: photofilmstrip: doc-base-unknown-section photofilmstrip:5 Video
>>
>> Checking the available documentation and running
>> install-docs --verbose --check debian/photofilmstrip.doc-base
>> show that "Video" is indeed a valid section, hence Lintian is wrong.
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I cannot reproduce this, I tested the deb photofilmstrip/1.9.91+dfsg-1
> currently in sid.
> 
> 
> As far as I can tell, Lintian has known about the Video section since
> 2008 (according to git blame).  So I am a bit puzzled about this report...
> 
> ~Niels
> 
> 
> 
> 

Hi,

I still cannot reproduce this and as I haven't heard from you, I am
taking the liberty of closing this as not a bug (as it looks to be
fixed).  If you can reproduce it, please write back and include the
version of Lintian you are using.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: