Re: RFC: Severity handling changes
Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes:
> What do people think of making "pedantic" a true severity? Currently it
> is treated like a pseudo-severity half the time and leads to code like:
Oh, huh, I thought it already was. Yes, I think pedantic should be a
severity.
> The second thing I would like to address is the need for checking the
> presence of severity and certainty (also in the code above). I presume
> it is a left over from the time severity + certainty was introduced in
> 2008. If I understand Russ's correctly[1], we finished that transition
> in Dec 2009.
Yup. We should be good to remove those sorts of checks now.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: