[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.5.11-7-g5626574



The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 562657418485250e512f25ccbf517bb514462419
Author: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date:   Fri Dec 14 22:18:28 2012 +0100

    d/changelog: Typo fixes
    
    Signed-off-by: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 94115a0..d6d8fba 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ lintian (2.5.11) experimental; urgency=low
     + [NT] Add tag for using the obsolete DMUA field.  Thanks to
       Ansgar Burchardt for the report.  (Closes: #688494)
     + [NT] Apply patches from Bernhard R. Link to check for
-      unintentional whitespace and use of non-cannical URIs in
+      unintentional whitespace and use of non-canonical URIs in
       Vcs-* fields.  (Closes: #681769)
     + [NT] Fix false-positive caused by insignificant whitespace.
       Thanks to Dima Kogan for the report.  (Closes: #693589)
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ lintian (2.5.11) experimental; urgency=low
   * checks/version-substvars{,.desc}:
     + [JW,NT] Extend version-substvar-for-external-package to
       all relations.  Previously it was only triggered for
-      strong dependnecy relations.  (Closes: #658474)
+      strong dependency relations.  (Closes: #658474)
 
   * collection/deb-format.desc:
     + [NT] Remove unneeded changelog-file from "Needs-Info".
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ lintian (2.5.11) experimental; urgency=low
   * frontend/lintian:
     + [NT] Remove chdir calls for checks.
     + [NT] Retire depreciated command line and config options.
-    + [NT] Refactor unpackaging into Lintian::Unpacker.
+    + [NT] Refactor unpacking into Lintian::Unpacker.
     + [NT] Make parameter for --jobs optional.  In its absence
       Lintian will not limit the number of parallel jobs.
     + [JW,NT] During the unpack phase, emit the name of the

-- 
Debian package checker


Reply to: