Re: Bits and pieces related to Lintian
- To: debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bits and pieces related to Lintian
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 15:37:32 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87fwow20gj.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <4DBBE1C0.5080803@thykier.net> (Niels Thykier's message of "Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:17:36 +0200")
- References: <4DB9A2F7.8050105@thykier.net> <87fwp1ok3o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4DBBE1C0.5080803@thykier.net>
Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes:
> On 2011-04-29 04:40, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yeah, typically there are oodles of wishlist bugs with an idea for some
>> sort of check that requires a lot of thought and/or work to do properly
>> and avoid false positives. Those tend to accumulate without a lot of
>> energy investment. The only thing that really helps is more people.
>> I'm hopefully going to have more free time coming up, although Policy
>> is in a similar state and I've been working on that first since no one
>> else has really been committing there, whereas Lintian is at least
>> treading water.
> Not that it is helping Lintian or the policy, but DEP-7 also could use
> your attention. :P
Yeah, I know. :P Way too much fun stuff to work on!
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: