[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#618001: marked as done (lintian: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token is sometimes not reported when it should)



Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:20:01 +0200
with message-id <20110329072001.GB14682@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#618001: lintian: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token is sometimes not reported when it should
has caused the Debian Bug report #618001,
regarding lintian: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token is sometimes not reported when it should
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
618001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
Severity: normal

I'm building libapache2-mod-qos_9.54-1.dsc. When I do a full build I get
this:
$ debuild
[...]
Now running lintian...
N: 1 tag overridden (1 error)
Finished running lintian.

When I do a source-only build I get this:
$ debuild -S
[...]
Now running lintian...
W: libapache2-mod-qos source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/libapache2-mod-qos.postinst
W: libapache2-mod-qos source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/libapache2-mod-qos.prerm
Finished running lintian.

This is obviously not normal.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils               2.21.0.20110302-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  diffstat               1.54-1            produces graph of changes introduc
ii  dpkg-dev               1.16.0            Debian package development tools
ii  file                   5.04-5            Determines file type using "magic"
ii  gettext                0.18.1.1-3        GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  intltool-debian        0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii  libapt-pkg-perl        0.1.24+b1         Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1            Perl module that automatically gen
ii  libemail-valid-perl    0.184-1           Perl module for checking the valid
ii  libipc-run-perl        0.89-1            Perl module for running processes
ii  libparse-debianchangel 1.1.1-2.1         parse Debian changelogs and output
ii  libtimedate-perl       1.2000-1          collection of modules to manipulat
ii  liburi-perl            1.58-1            module to manipulate and access UR
ii  locales                2.11.2-11         Embedded GNU C Library: National L
ii  locales-all [locales]  2.11.2-11         Embedded GNU C Library: Precompile
ii  man-db                 2.5.9-4           on-line manual pager
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-pe 5.10.1-17         Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

lintian recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn  binutils-multiarch            <none>     (no description available)
ii  libtext-template-perl         1.45-2     Text::Template perl module
ii  man-db                        2.5.9-4    on-line manual pager

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
notfound 618001 2.5.0~rc1
found 618001 2.4.3
fixed 618001 2.5.0~rc1
thanks

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Obviously - I should have checked the versions.  Unfortunately I cannot
> reproduce your exact problem with 2.5.0~rc1; I consistently get the
> warning as expected.

Same here, but I can reproduce it with 2.4.3 which was installed in my
build chroot (but I ran reportbug on my main system where I had the
experimental version hence the wrong version in my report).

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: