Bug#619755: marked as done (lintian fails to check -dbg package)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:22:07 +0100
with message-id <4D8E3CDF.4010706@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: lintian fails to check -dbg package
has caused the Debian Bug report #619755,
regarding lintian fails to check -dbg package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
619755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.4.3
Severity: normal
When I check the openldap package with lintian I get the following
error:
lintian
/home/matthijs/debpkg/openldap/build-area/openldap_2.4.24-1_amd64.changes
W: slapd: manpage-has-errors-from-man
usr/share/man/man5/slapo-retcode.5.gz 61: warning [p 1, 8.7i]: cannot
adjust line
W: libldap-2.4-2: unused-shlib-entry-in-control-file libldap-2.4 2
warning: collect info objdump-info about package slapd-dbg failed
warning: skipping check of binary package slapd-dbg
N: 2 tags overridden (2 warnings)
mkdir: cannot create directory `strings': No such file or directory
internal error: Failed to create directory
'strings/./usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/ldap'
Regards,
Matthijs Möhlmann
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.21.0.20110322-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.54-1 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.15.8.10 Debian package development tools
ii file 5.04-5 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.18.1.1-3 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.24+b1 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1 Perl module that automatically gen
ii libipc-run-perl 0.89-1 Perl module for running processes
ii libparse-debianchangel 1.1.1-2.1 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii libtimedate-perl 1.2000-1 collection of modules to manipulat
ii liburi-perl 1.58-1 module to manipulate and access UR
ii locales 2.11.2-13 Embedded GNU C Library: National L
ii man-db 2.5.9-4 on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-sha-pe 5.10.1-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none> (no description available)
ii libtext-template-perl 1.45-2 Text::Template perl module
ii man-db 2.5.9-4 on-line manual pager
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Version: 2.5.0~rc1
On 2011-03-26 20:12, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> Could you please re-test with lintian 2.5.0~rc1 from experimental? This
> looks very much like an issue we fixed in 2.5.0~rc1.
>
> ~Niels
>
> Hey Niels,
> This is indeed fixed in lintian from experimental.
> Thanks!
> Bug can be closed.
> Regards,
> Matthijs Möhlmann
Done :)
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=h2+M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: