[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608866: lintian: False positive: extra-license-file usr/games/rott-sitelicense



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-01-04 08:59, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.4.3
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 

Hey,

> in the pkg-games SVN repository I have modified the rott package to build an
> additional variant of the game that plays the CD Site License Version data
> files. The corresponding binary is 'usr/games/rott-sitelicense' and lintian
> complains it has found an extra license file. Sure, the file name contains the
> "license" string, but it is really just another variant of a game. Maybe
> lintian should skip files in /usr/bin, /usr/games, etc. or even binary files at
> all in this check.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Fabian
> 
> [...]

Thanks for the report; indeed this is a false-positive and I have just
committed a fix for it[1]. Lintian already excluded files in the normal
path directories (usr/bin/, usr/sbin/ ...), but we had forgotten to
exclude usr/games as well.

Excluding all binaries and known scripts might be a good idea, but I
have not deployed that change. Perhaps some of the other Lintian
maintainers can comment on that idea.

~Niels

[1]
http://git.debian.org/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=f7e8118e64e5dedf8933cde2bd1f176441ffdabc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNIyohAAoJEAVLu599gGRCmk4P/iP6D34Zh5XuwA9Msmv3eM4A
Wr7MQWvTWaLOA4OLkBEq3v8mD1xP0QGtqALmYdiYmw0dHuL2cGHAA6625L5gYUZZ
VhViNHoa9rWtvtiKEH4aqFzlpm6cvfUfyPjZC/saIK+WlohJaaDvxyZd1UMS2DY/
UsZuc+ZB39l8XYuD6zQuxxp8k0z7TdSnCYNtSDGvbebFPiuZmDiHEEf1IuUUj47q
3fUO0LPOn8bM4Qg909CXvQhFH1KdQHHG35hYCieBWfLqSTb9H4kOEazFFxF3dm6i
h8Dj+MkdHjoDxLdPp1ydWRPh2kmdGEkHvZ4sBvsyevGBcpWsY324ldf8zAv4IJ92
Pf8TMrqyJnZEW0LXV20TolYb/6W3VTujH4Tw8vCmKRz3wbd309Kthw5XCy2FJAmJ
hqj/dTEt/VZaSzp6Ju1/HSwrCywMWocLXsq62JVgs3ksGKl2mzPNuBxbJT26pNXK
wBLPGOaJ4FswdAo8htzmY9cq32SdgTxMXtaEPLovHVw8Pc3cSIcyyatjT0bhKI1X
1n8jnDNLOpJeU8eDQVqUWCySB7SngR8tRPe9RRl2h2n608zhqY0LxA1RKRdViaKw
UvUCpdIjI1cHhgm8dkbp0SMenc/rB+MqsvhJBA0M+VmCa0xKKAkq7IxtxH877YQ0
TIMqzMZVc0XmwUS6tiDL
=Rxny
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: