Re: ITM: Please review lab-refactor branch
On 2011-11-01 23:36, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-11-01 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> [...]
>> * How much of reporting/ has been tested with the new lab code? I
>> realise we don't have formal test coverage for it but from memory
>> getting a minimal setup working is fairly simple.
>>
>
> Not a lot to be honest. I have tested html_reports with the standard
> log file from lintian.d.o and an empty lab. Beyond that, "perl -Ilib -c
> $script" is about the testing it has received.
>
>
>[...]
I have tried this with a fake mirror consisting of a couple of minimal
auto-generated packages, which has weeded out some bugs. :)
/me wishes for a harness test-suite for Christmas... actually preferably
before that.
~Niels
Reply to: